Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tero, Alvaro,

 

Thanks a lot for the suggestions! I’ll create a ticket regarding undated references.

 

On the meantime, we’ll update the draft using a manual reference as Tero did in the past.

 

Thanks to both for your help!

 

Alberto

 

From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 at 4:30 PM
To: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <natal@xxxxxxxxx>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@xxxxxx>
Cc: secdir@xxxxxxxx <secdir@xxxxxxxx>, last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>, lisp@xxxxxxxx <lisp@xxxxxxxx>, draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf.all@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-10

Hi!

I agree with Tero.  If needed, the ticket can we worked on while the
document progresses — there’s no need to wait for resolution.

Use support@xxxxxxxx.

Thanks!

Alvaro.


On July 5, 2022 at 6:34:17 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:

> I think it should best to try to find out how to do the undated
> reference, and if it not really possible, then there most likely
> should be a issue ticket created asking for undated references.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux