Alvaro,
Yes, your suggested text would be fine with me.
Thanks,
Donald
===============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx
Donald
===============================
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:31 AM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On June 1, 2022 at 10:06:58 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
> > On 1 Jun 2022, at 15:46, Luigi Iannone wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alvaro,
> >
> >> On 1 Jun 2022, at 15:29, Alvaro Retana wrote:
> >> Nice sentence, but what does it mean? What action should the
> >> implementation take to satisfy "MUST be managed"? From Luigi's
> >> initial response (above), it sounds like the time between changes (TTL
> >> ?) has to be long enough... Please spell some of this out.
> >>
> >
> > What if we change to:
> >
> > Mapping updates, and their corresponding Map Version Number MUST be managed
> > so that a very old version number will not be confused as a new version
> > number (because of the circular numbering space).
> >
>
> Or may be:
>
> Mapping updates, and their corresponding Map Version Number MUST be managed
> so that a very old version number will not be confused as a new version
> number (because of the circular numbering space). To this end simple measures
> can be taken, like Updating a mapping only when all active traffic is using
> the latest version, or waiting sufficient time to be sure that mapping in
> LISP caches expire, which means waiting at least as much as the mapping Time-
> To-Live (as defined in 6833bis)
>
> Any preference?
The normative text is what is not clear enough for me: "MUST be
managed" is not actionable. The examples help. I would be fine if
the normative language is removed while still mentioning that it is a
requirement:
Mapping updates, and their corresponding Map Version Numbers have to be
managed so that a very old version number will not be confused as a new
version number (because of the circular numbering space). To this end...
Donald: is this ok with you?
Thanks!
Alvaro.
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
