Hi Alvaro, > On 1 Jun 2022, at 15:29, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Nice sentence, but what does it mean? What action should the > implementation take to satisfy "MUST be managed"? From Luigi's > initial response (above), it sounds like the time between changes (TTL > ?) has to be long enough... Please spell some of this out. > What if we change to: Mapping updates, and their corresponding Map Version Number MUST be managed so that a very old version number will not be confused as a new version number (because of the circular numbering space). Or you consider it too vague? Ciao L. > Thanks! > > Alvaro. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
