Re: Harassment, abuse, accountability. and IETF mailing lists
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
At least as a first approximation, I'm ok with the policy for non-WG
IETF mailing lists being the same as the policy for WG mailing lists,
and from that perspective the only clarification that seems to be needed
is to identify just who gets to decide when someone has crossed a line
and what to do about it.
But I don't want to create a duty to monitor non-WG mailing lists. I
don't actually think that having people who deliberately looking for
excuses to sanction people's behavior on non-WG mailing lists is a good
idea at all. That sounds a lot like witch hunting to me. Face it,
someone who wants to find reasons to attack someone will certainly find
them. And a person who never says anything controversial is probably
someone who is lacking in candor that IETF desperately needs.
Keith
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Mhonarc]
[Fedora Users]