Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-bit-grease-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 20, 2022, at 06:39, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote:
> This does not align with the definition of MAY in RFC 2119.
> I suggest:
>
>    Advertising the grease_quic_bit transport parameter indicates that
>    packets sent to this endpoint will be accepted with a value of 0 for
>    the QUIC Bit.

I've made a larger change so that things aren't quite so backward:

+An endpoint that advertises the grease_quic_bit transport parameter MUST accept
+packets with the QUIC Bit set to a value of 0.

I've made the other changes in https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease/pull/25

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux