> On May 20, 2022, at 1:15 AM, Martin Thomson <mt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, May 20, 2022, at 06:39, Russ Housley via Datatracker wrote: >> This does not align with the definition of MAY in RFC 2119. >> I suggest: >> >> Advertising the grease_quic_bit transport parameter indicates that >> packets sent to this endpoint will be accepted with a value of 0 for >> the QUIC Bit. > > I've made a larger change so that things aren't quite so backward: > > +An endpoint that advertises the grease_quic_bit transport parameter MUST accept > +packets with the QUIC Bit set to a value of 0. > > I've made the other changes in https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease/pull/25 Even better than the text that I proposed. Thanks. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
