assignment of IP space does not impune any other service. Asserting otherwise is foolish. Pressing the point, esp. in public fora, appears to be willful ignorance. Please enjoy your blissful state. --bill On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 02:02:45PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote: > The following message indicates that EP.NET has assigned an IP address to > ISC.ORG. You are quite well aware of this. Dissembling will not help > you. > > --Dean > > > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:26:42 -0500 (EST) > From: Dean Anderson <dean@xxxxxxx> > To: bill <bmanning@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Complaint regarding www.sorbs.net (204.152.186.189) (fwd) > > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, bill wrote: > > > I have no reason to act as your relay agent. We have no > > agreement in place for me to act in this manner. > > The traceroute I forwarded shows that your IP addresses 198.32.176.4 is > assigned to ISC.ORG, which typically indicates a relationship. > > > 8 paix-gw4.isc.org (198.32.176.4) 92.828 ms 91.036 ms 91.415 ms > > On Mon, 10 May 2004 bmanning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > but ISC.ORG doesn't want to take a complaint. Bill Manning, of EP.NET > > > (ISC.ORG upstream) says he has no contract with me to accept complaints > > > about ISC.ORG. > > > > > > --Dean > > > > Dean... you are asserting a relationship that you have no > > way to prove exists. Unless or until you can prove that > > ep.net is an upstream for isc.org, please refrain from > > making such statements. Traceroute is not your friend in > > this case. Defamation works many ways. > > > > --bill > > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
