On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 6:07 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 25-Feb-22 14:44, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 25. Feb 2022, at 01:42, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Our proposal: to set up a public mailing list of AUTH48 conversations,
>>
>> Please confirm that this is only for IETF stream documents so far.
>
> We already discussed this in the IRSG and would like to join.
>
> My personal take: We have enough ossification of RFC-related matters; I
don’t think we need to push this one up to 2026.
> The RSWG can tweak this when they get to power.
No, that assumes a fait accompli and that is very much against the spirit
of community-approved RFC policy which is what people have been demanding
for several years. Running an experiment now is fine, declaring a policy isn't.
I would expect the RSWG/RSAB to be operational a month or two from now; the last calls expire on March 7.
I concur with Brian and I appreciate him catching this.
-Ekr
Brian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest