'Andrew Sullivan' <sullivan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> never having been in a NomCom in any capacity, she did so in part
> relying on the idea that she could ask for certain advisors -- an idea
> I supported strongly. But someone in the community objected and the
> procedures meant that the objection carried. I felt terrible about
> this, because I felt that I'd put Barbara in a position where she
> thought she would have some resources that I was then unable to
> provide.
I am unclear how we reached rough consensus on this question.
But, perhaps we could formalize this into a clear (written) NDA on the part
of past chairs to be available to help.
>> I wonder whether a little more job description would go some way to
>> encouraging (self-)nominations.
> I think I could say what _I_ think the job is. What would thrill me
> more is if past Chairs had a wiki page or something about things that
> are common issues that crop up for them.
Wiki's are wonderful, but a two page job description with a document owner
would be better.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
