+1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 2:13 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 14-Feb-22 19:34, Eliot Lear wrote:
...
> How important is the chair role? [I honestly have no idea.]
Very important, I would say. A fair, conscientious and proactive chair
is necessary, and we've been very fortunate over the years. In other
words, the undefined process has worked pretty well, although I
fully understand Andrew's concerns.
The insider bias risk is considerably reduced by the fact that the
NomCom chair is non-voting.
On 15-Feb-22 03:04, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
...
>
>> I suspect that in reality the only way to get good candidate>> is to nicely ask a number of likely people and hope that one will say yes.
>>
>
> That's the process we have now, and it has the obvious problem
> that it depends on the Internet Society President (at present, me)
> having a good list of "likely people". Populating that list is
> what I'm trying to do.
A public call for candidates seems reasonable. I am however rather
concerned by the idea of a published list and call for comments.
I can imagine a variety of unfortunate side effects of this,
some of which might undermine the eventual chair's neutrality.
I'd advise against for the first year, until the effect of a
public call for candidates is known.
Brian Carpenter
