Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I have read:
>> draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model-11
>>
>> The RSWG seems like it isn't an IESG WG, nor is it an IAB Program.
>> It seems like it is a new flavour of thing. But, I think that it won't
>> really need any special bits in the datatracker, it could like any other WG?
>> I wonder if the letters "WG" might be replaced with something else.
> That was debated at length in the Program (for this effort *was* an
> IBM Program). The consensus was to stick with WG because we intend it
> to operate very much in the manner of an IETF WG, even though it
> isn't one.
okay, I understand, if it was debated already, I'll shutup about that.
But maybe we have to create some new pseudo-area to contain the RSAB.
What I'm asking is really about is where RSWG will show up in the "Groups"
drop-down menu on the DT.
Interesting typo there: IBM vs IAB.
Brian might be showing some history here :-)
Or... maybe the IETF is actually just a virtual reality running on one of the
five IBMs 360 that the world uses? Has it all just been a delusion since
Unix Epoch?
>> It seems that the IAB could appoint the IETF Chair (an IAB member) to the
>> RSAB, and the IESG could also appoint the IETF Chair. I think this unlikely,
>> and I don't propose to add any rules, but I noticed that.
>> Is draft-iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model the first document in the Editorial Stream?
> It needs to be in the IAB Stream really, to bootstrap the new stream, IMHO.
Okay.
It would fun if it could bootstrap itself.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
