On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 11:13 PM Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/31/21 3:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I repeat my suggestion that s/unprofessional/uncivil/ would fix the
> document under discussion.
Perhaps it would. And all other things being equal, a simpler fix is
attractive. But I don't know why others seem to insist on "professional".
The reason mybe that it is thought that only who authors an RFC is professional.
As years while checking in IETF context, it is seen some new people IETF motivation can be heard that 'you should write an RFC', but maybe a better motivation is 'you should work/discuss with one WG together regarding one milestone for progress.
If the word 'professional' makes confusion it is better to change it, or define it in the document.
I totally agree with the definition give by Keith, which is in the beginning of thread, so please add it to the draft.
Best Regards,
AB
