On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 16:12 Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/31/21 3:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I repeat my suggestion that s/unprofessional/uncivil/ would fix the
> document under discussion.
Perhaps it would. And all other things being equal, a simpler fix is
attractive. But I don't know why others seem to insist on "professional".
Keith
In the context of the document under discussion, I think “uncivil” is what is needed and might translate better to other languages and societies.
In my opinion, “professional” includes technical and ethical context that are unnecessary for particular usage. That is, any kind of “uncivil commentary, regardless of the general subject” is inappropriate on the IETF mailing list.
Nevertheless, of course IETF participants should act in a professional manner, but that isn’t the issue for that bullet.
===============================================
David Farmer Email:farmer@xxxxxxx
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
David Farmer Email:farmer@xxxxxxx
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
