On 25/10/2021 15:21, Sam Whited wrote:
I don't think RFC 7677 actually does define a mandatory-to- implement
channel binding, or am I missing something?
It doesn't change the MTI "tls-unique" defined in RFC 5802. Your draft
already updates RFC 5802, so I think it should similarly update RFC 7677.
If it does, that would make
sense as a good reason to update it.
—Sam
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, at 09:44, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
As RFC 7677 only specifies use of "tls-unique" as mandatory-to-
implement, I agree that it should be updated to point to your draft.
Maybe you could propose some text for how you think it updates 7677
or where you think a reference to 7677 would be appropriate and that
would make things more clear?
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
