Re: [Last-Call] [kitten] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-kitten-tls-channel-bindings-for-tls13-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't think RFC 7677 actually does define a mandatory-to- implement
channel binding, or am I missing something? If it does, that would make
sense as a good reason to update it.

—Sam

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, at 09:44, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> As RFC 7677 only specifies use of "tls-unique" as mandatory-to-
> implement, I agree that it should be updated to point to your draft.
>> Maybe you could propose some text for how you think it updates 7677
>> or where you think a reference to 7677 would be appropriate and that
>> would make things more clear?

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux