I don't think RFC 7677 actually does define a mandatory-to- implement channel binding, or am I missing something? If it does, that would make sense as a good reason to update it. —Sam On Mon, Oct 25, 2021, at 09:44, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > As RFC 7677 only specifies use of "tls-unique" as mandatory-to- > implement, I agree that it should be updated to point to your draft. >> Maybe you could propose some text for how you think it updates 7677 >> or where you think a reference to 7677 would be appropriate and that >> would make things more clear? -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
