imo - this path is only useful if we can accurately predict the future I’d rather leave the nomcom with the flexibility to deal with the reality of the moment & back to the original proposal - imo - term limits are a good way to get rid of rotten wood at the expense of good wood - again, I’d rather let the nomcom decide and, as others have said, the nomcom’s job is hard enough, making it even harder by removing flexibility seems like a bad idea Scott who has sometimes wondered what was on a noncom’s mind after seeing the choices made but would still not like to overly constrain the team that tries to do the job > On Oct 23, 2021, at 11:52 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My proposal takes the hard decision-making out of Nomcom's hands, and puts it into the IETF community. >
