I concur with Rich's request and favor a discussion but, if we
are going to do that, I request that draft-klensin-nomcom-term
(yes, from 2005-2006) be added as well. Unless Spencer has
vigorous objections, I'll try to find the original and get a
version with current dates, affiliations, etc., posted within
the next several days.
The abstract of that I-D read:
A consensus is emerging in the IETF that very long
tenure in leadership roles is not in the best interests
of the community. While, in theory, that advice could
simply be given to the NomCom, there is reason to
believe that a different model for consideration of
renewal or replacement for members of the leadership
would be more efficient for the NomCom and would impose
less hardship on incumbents and the community. This
document outlines that alternate method.
In addition to proposing an approach that would limit most
Nomcom appointees to two terms and change the way Nomcoms review
appointees, Section 3 (of -01) reviews the discussions at the
time about other alternatives including hard term limits.
john
--On Wednesday, October 20, 2021 14:37 +0000 "Salz, Rich"
<rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would like to have this on the next GENDISPATCH agenda.
>
> Name: draft-rsalz-termlimits
> Revision: 00
> Title: Term limits for IETF Leadership Positions
> Document date: 2021-10-20
> Group: Individual Submission
