> >> 1. Announcements sent manually by <various roles> = 284 > >> 2. Announcements of new and updated WG charters & WG closures = 44 > >> 3. (included in above 44) > >> 4. Announcements of new non-WG mailing lists = 13 > >> 5. Announcements of new RFCs = 275 > >> 6. IESG and LLC telechat announcements = 39 > >> 7. Announcements of document actions = 175 > >> 8. Announcements of IESG conflict-review results = 14 > >> 9. Last call announcements for I-Ds = 174 (+ 4 for other actions) > >> 10. Interim WG meeting announcements = 256 > >> > >> The "important-news" proposal would only retain those under (1) above. > > I think that 1, 4, and 6 should all be retained as is (and in the new > > list, if it's created). > > > > I think that 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 should be in a weekly summary, one > > single message per week. > > I have a slight problem with this proposal because if it is implemented > it would not be possible to find last call announcements by draft name. > I think this is a rather important feature when searching archive. > > Unfortunately I don't have a solution for this problem. I thought we were discussing changes to ietf-announce and not last-call. All these emails already exist on the last-call list and don't need to be repeated in their entirety on ietf-announce. A summary email to ietf-announce should be sufficient. Anybody wanting to subscribe to last-call has the ability to do so. Barbara
