After overwhelming response that we should do so, I am pursuing these status updates through bis documents.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:08 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an Area Director to make the
following status changes:
- RFC8321 from Experimental to Proposed Standard
(Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)
- RFC8889 from Experimental to Proposed Standard
(Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance
Monitoring)
The supporting document for this request can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-rfc8321-rfc8889-alt-mark-to-ps/
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2021-09-24. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The affected documents can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8321/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8889/
IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-rfc8321-rfc8889-alt-mark-to-ps/ballot/
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
