At 03:49 PM 3/27/2004, James Seng wrote: >Sound nice but isn't this go against the "rough consensus" principle? The "rough consensus" principle applies to IETF documents, not to RFCs in general. >You are free to doc your opinion (even if it is not rough consensus) in the >mailing list. > >-James Seng > >> What I personally view as "crap" has no bearing in regards to these >> points, excepting that where I feel strong enough to produce an I-D >> detailing why I think something is "crap" I should be allowed >> (if I can met general editorial and technical standards) to publish >> that opinion as an RFC even though consensus of the IETF (or Keith's >> review board or the RFC Editor) might be that my opinion is "crap". >> (That opinion could be expressed in the form of an alternative protocol >> specification.)