Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Personally, I'm more concerned by WGs demanding their right to
have their half-baked specifications published as RFCs, and the
for IESG to approve them without any IETF review or other
community review, or (as has happened in the past) even when
substantial oversights or design flaws in those specifications
were pointed out by individuals.

Please cite an example. In what case was there not a last call?


Eliot



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]