Sound nice but isn't this go against the "rough consensus" principle? You are free to doc your opinion (even if it is not rough consensus) in the mailing list. -James Seng > What I personally view as "crap" has no bearing in regards to these > points, excepting that where I feel strong enough to produce an I-D > detailing why I think something is "crap" I should be allowed > (if I can met general editorial and technical standards) to publish > that opinion as an RFC even though consensus of the IETF (or Keith's > review board or the RFC Editor) might be that my opinion is "crap". > (That opinion could be expressed in the form of an alternative protocol > specification.)
