The PR fully resolves my comment. Russ > On Mar 30, 2021, at 4:45 AM, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini=40ericsson.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The PR looks good, thanks Russ for pointing this out. If you have any more comments please let us know, otherwise I will push the button as soon as the draft is updated. > > Francesca > > On 04/03/2021, 10:44, "last-call on behalf of Carsten Bormann" <last-call-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2021-03-03, at 18:11, Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The text says "...MUST be a syntactically valid BER representation of an object identifier ...", but this is not fully correct. It is the value portion of the BER representation. The CBOR encoding does not carry (and dies not need to carry) the type of length bytes of the BER representation. > > Indeed. > > Now https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/pull/8 > > Thank you! > > Grüße, Carsten > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
