Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cbor-tags-oid-05.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Tags for Object Identifiers) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The PR looks good, thanks Russ for pointing this out. If you have any more comments please let us know, otherwise I will push the button as soon as the draft is updated.

Francesca

On 04/03/2021, 10:44, "last-call on behalf of Carsten Bormann" <last-call-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

    On 2021-03-03, at 18:11, Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > 
    > The text says "...MUST be a syntactically valid BER representation of an object identifier ...", but this is not fully correct.  It is the value portion of the BER representation.  The CBOR encoding does not carry (and dies not need to carry) the type of length bytes of the BER representation.

    Indeed.

    Now https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-oid/pull/8

    Thank you!

    Grüße, Carsten

    -- 
    last-call mailing list
    last-call@xxxxxxxx
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux