Re: Non routable IPv6 registry proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian,

> On Mar 14, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ULA is very dominant in these networks and it's probably also one of the
>> sources we got the first requests for establishing the ULA registry.
> 
> I can only repeat: if you want action from the IETF (and remember that
> on certain matters iesg@ietf can give instructions to the IANA), the case
> has to be made via an I-D. Facts, numbers, use case. Getting an RFC that
> sets up a first-come first-served ULA-C system isn't an impossible dream,
> but it is work. That would open up the entire fc00::/8 space.
> 

I agree.   I have always thought that the biggest issue for ULA-C is who maintains the central registry.   It needs to be free or very low cost, and permanent.

Bob


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux