Re: Non routable IPv6 registry proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 8:18 AM Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David,

> On Mar 11, 2021, at 6:26 PM, David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
> It is fairly common for Community Networks, especially wireless ones to use RFC 1918 for IPv4 and ULA for IPv6, and interconnect with other Community Networks over tunnels on donated ISP connectivity from participants or others. Ham radio is a good metaphor for this type of networking.
>

I disagree that Ham Radio (aka Amateur Radio) a good metaphor.   Amateur Radio is regulated by the ITU and countries, call signs are allocated by central authorities, radio frequencies are assigned, and there are rules for the types of traffic that can be sent.  For example, no commercial use.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_radio for details.

Bob / KI6ASK

Ok, yes, it's not a perfect metaphor, for the reasons you say. However, a lot of the same people involved in Amateur Radio, especially Amateur Packet Radio, are also frequently involved in Community Networking using WiFi and they have a lot of common goals. Basically, I was looking at it the who and why of it, but yes the hows, the technologies are completely different.

Thanks
--
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@xxxxxxx
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux