Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 08:17:22 +0100
In-reply-to: <d354b692-4a4c-6bc2-48e0-5be29952e5dd@network-heretics.com>
References: <e446a64e-0cfa-d97f-a604-50776242c8f0@nostrum.com> <d354b692-4a4c-6bc2-48e0-5be29952e5dd@network-heretics.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0

Am 10.03.2021 um 06:47 schrieb Keith Moore:

Robert,

Reading your note I find myself wondering: Is IETF deliberately trying
to discourage its participants from building tools to help them do IETF
work?

thanks,

Keith


What precisely in Robert's mail makes you ask that?

Best regards, Julian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
  - From: Keith Moore

References:
- Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
  - From: Robert Sparks
- Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
Next by Date: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: question: are the various IETF web sites IPv6 enabled? If not, why not?
Previous by thread: Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
Next by thread: Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux