Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 00:47:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <e446a64e-0cfa-d97f-a604-50776242c8f0@nostrum.com>
References: <e446a64e-0cfa-d97f-a604-50776242c8f0@nostrum.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1

Robert,

Reading your note I find myself wondering: Is IETF deliberately tryingto discourage its participants from building tools to help them do IETFwork?


thanks,

Keith

On 3/9/21 1:16 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:

The services at tools.ietf.org are undergoing a transition.


[etc]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
  - From: Julian Reschke

References:
- Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
  - From: Robert Sparks

Prev by Date: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: question: are the various IETF web sites IPv6 enabled? If not, why not?
Next by Date: Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
Previous by thread: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
Next by thread: Re: Clarifying the state of and the transition plan for tools.ietf.org
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux