On 3/3/2021 1:23 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, 03 March, 2021 10:28 -0800 Dave Crocker
<dcrocker@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
This is a question, not a request for change, but isn't the
questions of whether a new Content-disposition value will be
accepted and whether implementations will handle an unrecognized
value in a a reasonable way an inherent part of this experiment
and hence a point of concern?
cf my recent posting about false precision.
Please send comments to ietf-822@xxxxxxxx.
Up to Barry but, if this discussion is considered part of a Last
Call and IESG review in progress, should it not remain on this
list so that, among other things, the IESG sees it?
sigh. that line is part of the text going into the draft, to provide a
venue for feedback after the document is published. last-call is not an
appropriate venue for such follow-up messages.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
