On 3/3/2021 12:01 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
Documents published on the IETF stream require IETF Consensus.
If we are still arguing over what text to include relating to issues for
which there is no prior discussion and prior determination of consensus,
how can there be IETF consensus?
Except that we weren't still arguing.
The feeding frenzy only began because a couple of people made private
comments to the IESG. One was pressed to go public. My impression is
that the other had not intended their concerns to go public.
That private comments to the IESG are not automatically surfaced, in
some fashion, for public resolution, is a process point the IESG and the
IETF might want to consider, so that a frenzy like this happens at a
more reasonable point.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
