On 2/24/2021 2:49 PM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
I thought you were going to clean up whether the Content-Disposition was
"React" or "Reaction" based on the gen-art review, but the document still seems
internally inconsistent about it.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/zun860KMrKdwqyKSWbrvWSPMuYM/
indicates that "React" was the intent, but Sections 2 and 4.1 still use
"Reaction", while the IANA Considerations register "React". Section 3
uses lowercase "reaction" in the context of a "Content-Disposition"
header field as well. Section 7 mentions a "Reaction capability".
Well, drat. I thought I /did/ fix that, but indeed did /not/.
I've like 'react' as a quick reference, but staying consistent between
it and the full term has obviously proved more of a challenge than I'm
up to.
So I've changed all of the strings to 'reaction', except for internal
xml labels and the filename (for continuity.)
Thanks.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
dcrocker@xxxxxxxxx
408.329.0791
Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crocker2@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
