On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:16:26PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 2/24/2021 2:49 PM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote: > > I thought you were going to clean up whether the Content-Disposition was > > "React" or "Reaction" based on the gen-art review, but the document still seems > > internally inconsistent about it. > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/zun860KMrKdwqyKSWbrvWSPMuYM/ > > indicates that "React" was the intent, but Sections 2 and 4.1 still use > > "Reaction", while the IANA Considerations register "React". Section 3 > > uses lowercase "reaction" in the context of a "Content-Disposition" > > header field as well. Section 7 mentions a "Reaction capability". > > Well, drat. I thought I /did/ fix that, but indeed did /not/. > > I've like 'react' as a quick reference, but staying consistent between > it and the full term has obviously proved more of a challenge than I'm > up to. > > So I've changed all of the strings to 'reaction', except for internal > xml labels and the filename (for continuity.) Thanks; that works for me. -Ben -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
