Re: [Last-Call] New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-07.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Having reflected a bit about this, this morning, I now think it reasonable to add a bit
> more, but not really of the sort that has been discussed.
>
> Here's what I propose:
>
> 7. Experimental Goals
>
> The basic, email-specific mechanics for this capability are well-established and
> well-understood. Points of concern, therefore, are:
>
> Technical issues in using emojis within a message body part
> Market interest
> Usability
>
> So the questions to answer for this Experimental specification are:
>
> Is there demonstrated interest by MUA developers?
> If MUA developers add this capability, is it used by authors?
> Does the presence of the Reaction capability create any operational problems for
> recipients?
> Does the presence of the Reaction capability demonstrate additional security
> issues?
> What specific changes to the specification are needed?
> What other comments will aid in use of this mechanism?
>
> Please send comments to ietf-822@xxxxxxxx.

For my part, I'm happy with that version.

Barry

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux