Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Roni, thanks for your review. Ken, thanks for addressing Roni’s comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Feb 17, 2021, at 12:07 AM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ken,
> Thanks, it is OK 
> Roni
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ken Murchison [mailto:murch@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 2:27 PM
>> To: Roni Even; gen-art@xxxxxxxx
>> Cc: calsify@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions.all@xxxxxxxx; last-
>> call@xxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04
>> 
>> Hi Roni,
>> 
>> Thanks for the review.  Your comment is addressed below.
>> 
>> 
>> On 2/15/21 5:32 AM, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote:
>>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>>> Review result: Ready with Nits
>>> 
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
>>> the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like
>>> any other last call comments.
>>> 
>>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>> 
>>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>> 
>>> Document: draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-??
>>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>>> Review Date: 2021-02-15
>>> IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-16
>>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>>> 
>>> Summary:
>>> The document is ready for publication as standard track RFC with nits
>>> 
>>> Major issues:
>>> 
>>> Minor issues:
>>> 
>>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>> 
>>> 1. The structured-location is optional so if it is not specified for
>>> proximity I assume that it implies current location?
>> 
>> 
>> STRUCTURED-LOCATION is optional because its not used for PROXIMITY:
>> [DIS]CONNECT.  I've made the following change to the text:
>> 
>>              <t hangText="Description:">This property is used to
>>              indicate that an alarm has a location-based trigger. Its
>>              value identifies the direction of motion used to trigger
>> -            the alarm. One or more location values are set using
>> +            the alarm. One or more location values MUST be set using
>>              "STRUCTURED-LOCATION" properties.</t>
>> 
>> Is this sufficient?
>> 
>> --
>> Kenneth Murchison
>> Senior Software Developer
>> Fastmail US LLC
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux