Hi Roni, Thanks for the review. Your comment is addressed below. On 2/15/21 5:32 AM, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2021-02-15 IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-16 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is ready for publication as standard track RFC with nits Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: 1. The structured-location is optional so if it is not specified for proximity I assume that it implies current location?
STRUCTURED-LOCATION is optional because its not used for PROXIMITY: [DIS]CONNECT. I've made the following change to the text:
<t hangText="Description:">This property is used to indicate that an alarm has a location-based trigger. Its value identifies the direction of motion used to trigger - the alarm. One or more location values are set using + the alarm. One or more location values MUST be set using "STRUCTURED-LOCATION" properties.</t> Is this sufficient? -- Kenneth Murchison Senior Software Developer Fastmail US LLC -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
