Re: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gorry Fairhurst wrote on 20/02/2021 13:52:
Yes, I thought that was the intention, although the current text
seems to me to be describing a tradeoff, and the word "cost" is
ambiguous in terms of processing resource and manufacture cost, so I
agree we could do better.

We couldn't avoid it completely. The explanation there was minimal and was included to help the reader understand what was going on.

- Maybe "overall performance" isn't the right word here either. You
will know what is best - perhaps this is talking about "packet
forwrading rate"?

Yep - "packet forwarding rate" works, and is clearer.  Thanks!

Nick

--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux