There is a big difference between making only one comment that is deliberately insulting and making a comment that some people are going to take offense at but is an accurate description of the situation.
My comment was pointing out that the github discussion had turned into an editor war discussion. As I keep pointing out, the starting point here is git is a source code manager with some ad hoc process capabilities bolted on and I intend to build a process collaboration capability.
Selling the technology back to Microsoft/Github might well end up being one of the exit strategies. It might have escaped notice but you are not limited to using git on github.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 10:53 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
- I take offense at this description of my work and demand an immediate apology.
…
- Of course I didn't expect the folk who can't understand what is wrong with nroff to understand the limitations of github.
So do you want an apology from someone’s snarky/meme-invoking summary of a big thread on ietf@? Or is it not necessary since you insulted in return?
