On 2021-01-08, at 14:04, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I guess we have different expectations of how much time a reviewer should spend on their document review. > > With relevance to this discussion the question is: did the use of tools like Github make your review activities more or less difficult to do this type of "background check”? Normally, I’d check out the repo and look at the most recent commits for the general area that I have questions about — that might lead me to pull requests and the issues they close. A keyword search in the issues might also yield (as I would do in the mailing list). Independent of github vs. mail, that obviously can be done for one or two issues, not for 30. (If there are 30 issues where I disagree with the document, maybe we have greater problems.) Grüße, Carsten
