Hi Carsten, I guess we have different expectations of how much time a reviewer should spend on their document review. With relevance to this discussion the question is: did the use of tools like Github make your review activities more or less difficult to do this type of "background check"? Ciao Hannes -----Original Message----- From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 1:54 PM To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@xxxxxxx> Cc: Michael Thomas <mike@xxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Old directions in social media. On 2021-01-08, at 13:28, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > If the document you are supposed to be reviewing does not give enough context so that you have to review the mailing list discussions then there is clearly something wrong with the document. > That should have been your review comment. As a reviewer, I try not to relitigate discussions that the WG already had. The outcome will be documented in the spec, but not the reason why it differs from my personal preference. Grüße, Carsten IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
