Re: Call for Community Feedback: Retiring IETF FTP Service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hiya,

On 16/11/2020 16:52, Keith Moore wrote:
On 11/16/20 11:47 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:

There's a counter-movement among many that the IETF should not be building bespoke tools.  This seems, most notably, to come up in meetecho v other videoconf systems.

Yeah, I emphatically oppose that counter-movement.    As far as I can tell it's basically an effort to make IETF less functional, less able to serve its purpose.

I don't think impugning people's motives is fair there,
and asserting that they are making "an effort to make
IETF less functional" commits that sin IMO.

IIUC there are a bunch of people who think the IETF would
be better run if we used COTS products and services much
more. I don't tend to agree with that (being unfond of e.g.,
the privacy-loss and lack-of-control that I think would
ensue), but I do think those people are well-intentioned.

S.



Attachment: OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux