> On 08/27/2020 9:14 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > After taking a look at the draft's new IANA considerations, I have to say that Section 3 is extremely well written. I had to take another look at RFC 8126 but I think this really checks all the boxes. BEST current practice indeed. > > Maybe it could use just a touch more to keep the crazies out....how about specification required, expert review, IESG review, IAB review, and a spelling test. > > > > On 08/27/2020 3:24 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the > > following document: - 'Updated registration rules for URI.ARPA' > > <draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03.txt> as Best Current Practice > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > > last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-09-24. Exceptionally, comments may > > be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning > > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > > > Abstract > > > > > > This document updates RFC 3405 by removing references to the IETF > > tree from the procedures for requesting that a URI scheme be inserted > > into the uri.arpa zone. > > > > > > > > > > The file can be obtained via > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update/ > > > > > > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dispatch mailing list > > dispatch@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
