After taking a look at the draft's new IANA considerations, I have to say that Section 3 is extremely well written. I had to take another look at RFC 8126 but I think this really checks all the boxes. BEST current practice indeed.
Maybe it could use just a touch more to keep the crazies out....how about specification required, expert review, IESG review, IAB review, and a spelling test.
On 08/27/2020 3:24 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider thefollowing document: - 'Updated registration rules for URI.ARPA'<draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03.txt> as Best Current PracticeThe IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits finalcomments on this action. Please send substantive comments to thelast-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2020-09-24. Exceptionally, comments maybe sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginningof the Subject line to allow automated sorting.AbstractThis document updates RFC 3405 by removing references to the IETFtree from the procedures for requesting that a URI scheme be insertedinto the uri.arpa zone.The file can be obtained viaNo IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D._______________________________________________dispatch mailing list
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call