I was pointing out a fundamental. It doesn't help that authors can submit documents in other forms than XML if authors get back comments, suggestions in another form. Using Git to manage document edits also implies you've agreed to the input format.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 4:59 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
- Any document workflow that requires a manual format conversion at an interface with a review function fails miserably because the comments are made on the processed output and don't map back readily to comments on the author's source.
Do you know any publication system that places no restrictions on input format? Or do I not understand what you are asking.
