Re: Principles of Spam-abatement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please note that the BoF scheduled for Korea, MARID, has a
very specific topic and that discussion of other spam-related
issues is not appropriate for that session. The BoF agenda is
available at:

http://www.ietf.org/ietf/04mar/marid.txt

To quote the salient part of the agenda:

This BoF will be strictly limited to measures related to MTA authentication; no
other anti-spam measures or topics will be considered. The BoF will explicitly
consider how DNS-based MTA authentication mechanisms would be implemented and
deployed, and it will consider the impact on the overall DNS infrastructure of
this deployment.

With best regards, Ted Hardie co-chair, MARID BoF



At 3:59 PM -0500 02/26/2004, John Leslie wrote:
   I strongly recommend gathering some principles of spam-abatement to
enlighten the spam BOF at IETF-59. (I'd be happy to edit such a
document, but it might be better to chose someone who will attend
IETF-59...

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If we can communicate the fact that a message is discarded because it was categorized as spam back to the sender without adverse side effects, then occasional false positives aren't much of a problem.

I nominate this statement for #1 on that list of principles.


--
John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]