I strongly recommend gathering some principles of spam-abatement to enlighten the spam BOF at IETF-59. (I'd be happy to edit such a document, but it might be better to chose someone who will attend IETF-59... Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > If we can communicate the fact that a message is discarded because it > was categorized as spam back to the sender without adverse side > effects, then occasional false positives aren't much of a problem. I nominate this statement for #1 on that list of principles. -- John Leslie <john@xxxxxxx>