On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:48:07PM -0400, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > Ben, > > So there can be an "official" plain text version in that it > > is on the RFC Editor's website, but it is not authoritative or immutable. > > > > There already is an official plain text rendering on the RFC > Editor's website. See, for example, > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8905.txt, and > https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8905, which has the button to press to > get it. Right. My point is that it is only "official" in scare quotes, since it's not the immutable archival artifact representing the RFC. > That said, the plain text version is the least useful rendering for > reading, since it can't include any SVG drawings. It's really only useful > as input to rfcdiff. If you want to read on a screen, use the HTML > rendering, and if you want to print it, use the PDF rendering. Of course. -Ben
