In article <20201027200703.GV39170@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx> wrote: >Right. My point is that it is only "official" in scare quotes, since it's >not the immutable archival artifact representing the RFC. There's a whole separate can of worms about how and if we would recreate the rendered versions of RFCs if, say. we made a change to xml2rfc that improved the results, or we found a bug that messed up one of the outputs. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
