>> "centiseconds"? Really? "tenths of seconds" would be clearer to most >> readers! > Perhaps this was intentional, but a centisecond is a hundredth of a second, The wording is consistent with Section 4.1.2 of draft-ietf-babel-rfc6126bis: Relative times are carried as 16-bit values specifying a number of centiseconds (hundredths of a second). It then goes on to justify this somewhat unusual choice of units: This allows times up to roughly 11 minutes with a granularity of 10ms, which should cover all reasonable applications of Babel > maybe spelling it out as you suggest is reasonable. I agree, a parenthetical remark to define the unit would be helpful, simlarly to what is done in rfc6126bis. -- Juliusz -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
