Something else, most of the discussions was related to changing drafts' names, for example BefoRe IANA taken any reservation to version number 10 in the internet protocol, I suggested using this number as a good indicator to the idea, because it reflects the meaning of the draft and will be used technically, but there was no reviews or any official decision regarding whether this draft should be considered at the IETF or to be neglected and no more discussion about it, this is what I call, take it or leave it. Best regards, Khaled Omar -----Original Message----- From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Khaled Omar Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 11:16 PM To: Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: RE: IETF Chair I have 5 proposals with the IETF: 1) IPv10. 2) KHALED Routing Protocol (KRP). 3) Numbering Exchange Protocol (NEP) ..... this idea was stolen. 4) Satellite Internet (SI). 5) ASN Label Switching Protocol (ALSP). None of them taken seriously except one, the 3rd, taken not seriously and idea was stolen by Cisco. Best regards, Khaled Omar -----Original Message----- From: Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 11:12 PM To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: IETF Chair Historically, the people who put in the work "win" (bad word). What work have you done, other than posting messages that have gotten replies that you don't like?
