Re: multi-site meetings --- the nature of IETF 111 -- SFO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On 22 Sep 2020, at 17:38, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Asking the WG chairs to decide which WG members might be the most important is not a good way for the IETF to go. The fact that many of the authors and regular list contributors for the WG are in one region is irrelevant to the value of a meeting.


Yes, but let’s not kid ourselves, either: if the key contributors don’t show up it’s going to be a pretty boring meeting, or worse, you end up with consensus decisions that get overturned in email.

Eliot






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux